Negotiating with Hard Bargainers – The Secret Sauce

by Omid Ghamami

It’s probably the #1 question I get from clients – how do we negotiate with hard bargainers?  Well, the question itself implies that there is something wrong with your negotiation process.

Why? Because a hard bargainer is someone who doesn’t budge at the negotiation table, and that’s far too late in the process to be addressing the issue.  A negotiation is a continuum, not an event in time, and certainly not limited to the negotiation table itself.

The very short answer to how to negotiate with hard bargainers at the negotiation table is “you don’t”.  Instead of negotiating with them using At The Table moves, you negotiate with them using AWAY From the Table moves. 

What does that mean?  Allow me to explain.

Traditional negotiation approaches that we’ve all been taught focus exclusively on At The Table negotiation strategies. I think it’s because At The Table strategies are glorified, viewed as how the savvy negotiators get the biggest deals done. 

Nothing could be further from the truth.    This derives from 1950’s negotiation strategies that are still popular and being taught today. 

The reality is, a negotiator on the other side can only be a hard bargainer when they have (or pretend to have) Bargaining Power – sometimes known as leverage.  They derive negotiating strength from this and they use it.  That’s what you are seeing.

The novice and intermediate negotiators then try and develop tactics and counter tactics to respond to this Bargaining Power.  Again, more mistakes. 

Read this twice:  You don’t respond to hard bargaining tactics and strategies.  *You plan for and prevent them*.  

A hard bargainer is akin to an onion.  Ever try cooking an entire onion whole?  It doesn’t work. 

You have to peel all the layers off to find out what is going on inside with the hard bargainer.

YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE SOURCE IS OF THEIR BARGAINING POWER.  

From where do they derive their bargaining power?  Keep peeling.  What exactly is it that allows them to derive negotiating leverage?  Keep peeling until you are sure you understand it.  Here are some examples:

  • Supplier relationships with internal end users
  • Perception or belief that you are too married to them as the incumbent and can’t or won’t switch.
  • Proprietary material, technology, or intellectual property that they feel you can’t live without.
  • Business units have told them they love their product/service and no other company is acceptable.
  • Shortage of supply
  • Perceived product/service superiority
  • Extremely short timelines inside your company
  • Difficulties in qualifying another supplier

All of these and more are reasons that you may have a hard bargainer on the other side.  But you have to research and diagnose exactly which it is.   That is what you are getting paid to do in procurement.   

Then, once you are you are sure you know what the source of their bargaining power is, you devise strategies to decrease their leverage to level the playing field – or even put it in your advantage. 

As long as you do this ethically and legally, and as long as you are not trying to take advantage of the other party, there is nothing wrong with doing this. 

Let me give a real example.  A colleague of mine was working with a company that had a huge problem:  the supplier was completely aligned with all the business units.  Very, very deep knit relationships were in place. 

It made it nearly impossible to switch suppliers and the supplier knew it and took advantage of it – they were always the hardest bargainers ever at the negotiation table. 

So procurement mapped out their internal business units, determining which ones were most contributing to this source of negotiating leverage for the supplier.  They then ranked all the business unit representatives, from greatest allegiance to the supplier to least allegiance to the supplier.

They then made a case for putting out the business to bid, something that hadn’t been done in perhaps more than a decade.  They started with the business unit lead with least supplier allegiance and easily got their agreement.  

Then they successively went to each business unit lead that had the least remaining allegiance, and started to use the Social Proof principle: “all these other business unit leads have already signed up, so we are asking for you to join them. “

By the time they got to the most supplier aligned business unit leads, almost all the business units were already on board.  The remaining business units really had no choice but to agree.  And so the business went out to bid, shocking and mortifying the incumbent supplier, who didn’t see this coming.

But procurement didn’t stop there.  Once they had all the business unit leads on board, they then went to the in the same order, asking them to sign a letter addressed to all suppliers in the bid process, stating that if they contacted other than procurement during the bidding and negotiation process, they would be immediately disqualified. 

Once again, they went in the same order and succeeded.   All those signatures were obtained from the business unit leads, and the powerful letter was sent to the suppliers in the bid – including the incumbent. All of them complied.

Now, the source of that supplier’s bargaining power was taken away.  Once bids were in and procurement started holding At The Table negotiations with the incumbent, it was a totally different personality on the other side.  Compromising. Appeasing.  Hungry. Unsure. And most of all, totally willing to negotiate.

That my friends is how you deal with hard bargainers.  The CPSCM™ Certification Program shows you exactly how to be a Negotiation Godfather.  And *just wait* until you see the announcement I have coming soon.

Now go off and do something wonderful.  Be your best!

Omid G.

“THE Godfather of Negotiation Planning” ~ Intel Corp

Previous post:

Next post: